© 2026 KVNF Public Radio
THE COMMON THREAD
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

KVNF's 2026 General Election Guide

Colorado's general election is Tuesday, Nov. 3. Every active registered voter gets a mail ballot, and county clerks had until Oct. 9 to send them. This guide covers what's on the ballot in Delta, Hinsdale, Mesa, Montrose, Ouray and San Miguel counties: every race and candidate on the ballot, the 14 statewide ballot measures and local questions, with links to reporting from KVNF and partner newsrooms.

Key dates

  • By Oct. 12: Ballot drop boxes are open across the state.
  • By Oct. 19: Voter centers are open for in-person voting across the state.
  • Oct. 26: Last day to register and still get a ballot in the mail, and the last day the state suggests mailing your ballot back.
  • Oct. 27 on: Return your ballot to a drop box or voter center instead of mailing it, or vote in person.
  • Tuesday, Nov. 3, Election Day: Your ballot must reach your county clerk by 7 p.m. Postmarks don't count. If you're in line by 7 p.m., you can still vote. You can register and vote in person at a voter center until 7 p.m.

Voting resources

Want to look up your own ballot, or try balancing the state budget? Interactive tools from other organizations are at the bottom of this page.

Who's on the ballot

Tap a section to open it. Pick your county and its races open at the top, and races it doesn't vote on are hidden. Where we have it, the Coverage column links to KVNF's own reporting first, then to coverage from partner newsrooms: CPR News, The Colorado Sun, KUNC, fellow Rocky Mountain Community Radio stations and Chalkbeat.

Show what’s on the ballot in:

Your own ballot depends on your address. Picking a county puts its races first and hides races it doesn’t vote on.

KVNF marks KVNF’s own reporting. Links under “From partners” are other newsrooms’ work, tagged with the outlet’s name.

Federal

CandidatePartyCoverage
U.S. Senate
Mark BaisleyCampaign websiteRepublican
From partners
John Hickenlooper incumbentCampaign websiteDemocratic
Bob ChewCampaign websiteForward
From partners
Christopher BaumApproval VotingNone yet
Blake HuberCampaign websiteLibertarianNone yet
Adam WithrowCampaign websiteUnityNone yet
U.S. House, District 3
Dwayne L. RomeroCampaign websiteDemocratic
Jeff Hurd incumbentCampaign websiteRepublican
Cory RobertsonLibertarianNone yet
Clifton BrownCampaign websiteUnaffiliatedNone yet

Statewide

CandidatePartyCoverage
Governor and Lieutenant Governor
Victor MarxRunning mate: George Washington MarkertCampaign websiteRepublican
Phil WeiserRunning mate: Lesley DahlkemperCampaign websiteDemocratic
Stephen T. HamiltonRunning mate: James K TreibertAmerican ConstitutionNone yet
Eric MulderRunning mate: Wayne HarlosCampaign websiteLibertarianNone yet
Jeff PeckmanRunning mate: T.J. ColeCampaign websiteUnity
Erik UnderwoodRunning mate: Frank AtwoodCampaign websiteApproval VotingNone yet
Greg LopezRunning mate: Taralyn RomeroCampaign websiteUnaffiliated
Secretary of State
Amanda GonzalezCampaign websiteDemocratic
James WileyCampaign websiteRepublican
Sean VadneyCampaign websiteLibertarianNone yet
Amanda CampbellAmerican ConstitutionNone yet
Celeste LandryCampaign websiteForwardNone yet
State Treasurer
Jeff BridgesCampaign websiteDemocratic
Kevin GranthamCampaign websiteRepublican
Jodie BarrLibertarianNone yet
Marilee Langner SturgisApproval VotingNone yet
Attorney General
Michael J. AllenCampaign websiteRepublican
Jena GriswoldCampaign websiteDemocratic

State Board of Education

CandidatePartyCoverage
Congressional District 3
Sherri M Wright incumbentCampaign websiteRepublicanNone yet
Barb ClementiCampaign websiteDemocraticNone yet

State Legislature

CandidatePartyCoverage
State Senate, District 7 One candidate on the ballotAll of Mesa County, plus part of Delta County around Cedaredge.
Janice Rich incumbentRepublicanNone yet
State House, District 54In Mesa County: Fruita, Palisade, Clifton, Fruitvale, Loma, Collbran, De Beque, most unincorporated areas and a small part of Grand Junction. In Delta County: the Delta, Cedaredge and Orchard City areas.
Jason BiasRepublicanNone yet
Mallory MartinDemocratic
State House, District 55Most of Grand Junction, plus Orchard Mesa and the Redlands, in Mesa County.
Rick Taggart incumbentRepublicanNone yet
Brittni PackardDemocraticNone yet
State House, District 58 One candidate on the ballotAll of Montrose, Ouray, San Miguel and Hinsdale counties, plus the Paonia, Hotchkiss and Crawford areas of Delta County. The district also includes Gunnison and Dolores counties and part of Montezuma County.
Larry Don Suckla incumbentRepublicanNone yet

Delta County

CandidatePartyCoverage
Commissioner, District 1
Matt SoperRepublican
Nathan ClayDemocratic
Clerk and Recorder One candidate on the ballot
Rene D. WarnerRepublican
Treasurer One candidate on the ballot
Brittany KuhnRepublican
Assessor One candidate on the ballot
Jolene George incumbentRepublican
Sheriff
Quinn ArchibequeRepublican
Demitri StelterDemocraticNone yet
James D LesterUnaffiliatedNone yet
Surveyor No candidates on the ballot
Coroner
Jill DeneauDemocraticNone yet
Lance B. Boren incumbentRepublicanNone yet

Montrose County

CandidatePartyCoverage
Commissioner, District 2 One candidate on the ballot
Caryn Webb Gibson incumbentRepublican
Commissioner, District 3 One candidate on the ballot
Ed LaffertyRepublicanNone yet
Clerk and Recorder One candidate on the ballot
Tressa Guynes incumbentRepublican
Treasurer One candidate on the ballot
Rosemary Murphy incumbentRepublican
Assessor One candidate on the ballot
Brad Hughes incumbentRepublican
Sheriff One candidate on the ballot
Gene R Lillard incumbentRepublican
Surveyor One candidate on the ballot
James Pierce Jr.RepublicanNone yet
Coroner One candidate on the ballot
Shaye SchottelRepublicanNone yet
West End Health Service District board, 2 seats (to May 2027)Vote for up to two. Voters inside the proposed district in Montrose County's West End. Directors take office only if Ballot Question 6A passes.
Ruth A. ReamsNonpartisanNone yet
Robert W. Ralph Sr.NonpartisanNone yet
Lorraine GarveyNonpartisanNone yet
West End Health Service District board, 3 seats (to May 2029)Vote for up to three. Voters inside the proposed district in Montrose County's West End. Directors take office only if Ballot Question 6A passes.
Randi LathamNonpartisanNone yet
Troy MastersNonpartisanNone yet
Christine DanielsNonpartisanNone yet

Ouray County

CandidatePartyCoverage
Commissioner, District 2 One candidate on the ballot
Michelle Nauer incumbentUnaffiliatedNone yet
Clerk and Recorder One candidate on the ballot
Damon Todd incumbentUnaffiliatedNone yet
Treasurer One candidate on the ballot
Trisha OaklandUnaffiliatedNone yet
Assessor One candidate on the ballot
Susie Mayfield incumbentUnaffiliatedNone yet
Sheriff One candidate on the ballot
Justin Perry incumbentUnaffiliatedNone yet
Surveyor One candidate on the ballot
Tim Pasek incumbentUnaffiliatedNone yet
Coroner One candidate on the ballot
R. Glenn Boyd incumbentUnaffiliatedNone yet

San Miguel County

CandidatePartyCoverage
Commissioner, District 2
Paul ReichDemocratic
Dylan D. BrooksUnaffiliated
Clerk and Recorder One candidate on the ballot
Michael Wyszynski incumbentDemocraticNone yet
Treasurer One candidate on the ballot
Brandi R. Hatfield incumbentDemocraticNone yet
Assessor One candidate on the ballot
Sarah Enders incumbentUnaffiliatedNone yet
Sheriff
Lane Keith MastersDemocratic
Dan Covault incumbentUnaffiliated
Surveyor One candidate on the ballot
J. David Foley incumbentDemocraticNone yet
Coroner One candidate on the ballot
Emil Sante incumbentDemocraticNone yet

Hinsdale County

CandidatePartyCoverage
Commissioner, District 2 One candidate on the ballot
Kristine Borchers incumbentRepublicanNone yet
Clerk and Recorder One candidate on the ballot
Joan Roberts incumbentRepublicanNone yet
Treasurer One candidate on the ballot
Lori Hanko incumbentRepublicanNone yet
Assessor One candidate on the ballot
Allison WaddingtonRepublicanNone yet
Sheriff
Jordan KaminskiRepublicanNone yet
Dan StrausbaughUnaffiliatedNone yet
Surveyor No candidates on the ballot
Coroner No candidates on the ballot

Mesa County

CandidatePartyCoverage
Commissioner, District 2 One candidate on the ballot
Bobbie Daniel incumbentRepublicanNone yet
Clerk and Recorder One candidate on the ballot
Bobbie Gross incumbentRepublicanNone yet
Treasurer
Greg HaitzRepublicanNone yet
Dave EdwardsDemocraticNone yet
Christina Aline SchultzForwardNone yet
Assessor One candidate on the ballot
Brent Goff incumbentRepublicanNone yet
Sheriff One candidate on the ballot
Ross YoungRepublicanNone yet
Surveyor One candidate on the ballot
Jon KobylarzRepublicanNone yet
Coroner One candidate on the ballot
Dean Havlik incumbentRepublicanNone yet

Judicial retention

JudgeEvaluation
Colorado Supreme Court
William W. Hood, IIIMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
Colorado Court of Appeals
Rebecca Rankin FreyreMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
Elizabeth L. HarrisMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
Katharine E. LumMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
Pax MoultrieMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
Karl L. SchockMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
Grant SullivanMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
District Court, 7th Judicial District
D. Cory JacksonMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
Kellie L. StarrittMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
Hinsdale County CourtHinsdale County voters only.
James McDonaldMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
District Court, 21st Judicial DistrictMesa County voters only.
Jeremy ChaffinMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
Craig Peter HendersonMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
Gretchen B. LarsonMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
JenniLynn E. LawrenceMeets Performance Standards, on a 4-4 commission vote Read the evaluation
Mesa County CourtMesa County voters only.
Scott Joseph BurrillMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation
Bruce R. RaaumMeets Performance Standards Read the evaluation

Ballot measures

Colorado voters will decide 14 statewide measures this year. Amendments change the state constitution and need 55% of the vote to pass, except Amendment 87, which needs a simple majority because its only change to the constitution is to delete language. Propositions change state law and need a majority. Tap a section, then a measure, to read about it. Pick your county and its local questions open at the top.

Show what’s on the ballot in:

Your own ballot depends on your address. Picking a county puts its races first and hides races it doesn’t vote on.

KVNF marks KVNF’s own reporting. Links under “From partners” are other newsrooms’ work, tagged with the outlet’s name.

Statewide ballot measures

Amendment 81 Law Enforcement Reporting Requirements to Federal Authorities

Needs 55% of the vote

Requires police, jail officers and district attorneys' offices to notify the U.S. Department of Homeland Security within 72 hours of charging someone with a violent crime, or with any crime if the person has a prior felony conviction, when the person isn't lawfully present in the United States or a reasonable effort can't establish whether they are.

Supporters say
It would improve public safety and increase cooperation between local and federal authorities.
Opponents say
It would report people to federal immigration authorities when they're charged, before any finding of guilt, and could erode trust between immigrant communities and police.

Official text

Amendment 82 Right to Natural Gas

Needs 55% of the vote

Creates a constitutional right for consumers to buy natural gas for cooking or heating in homes and businesses, and for distributors and utilities to sell it to them.

Supporters say
Natural gas is affordable and reliable, including in extreme cold, and most Colorado households heat with it; the amendment would protect access to it from state and local government interference.
Opponents say
Because it changes the constitution with broad language, it could make it harder for communities to enforce safety rules, pollution limits and building codes.

Official text

Amendment 83 Constitutional Right to Hunt and Fish

Needs 55% of the vote

Creates a constitutional right to hunt, fish and harvest fish and wildlife by traditional methods, for species the state manages (not non-game or endangered species, or species illegal to hunt under federal law), and makes hunting and fishing the preferred way to manage fish and wildlife populations. The state could still regulate hunting, fishing and wildlife management when necessary for sound scientific conservation and management, public safety, or to preserve future hunting and fishing opportunities.

Supporters say
It would give hunting and fishing lasting protection against future attempts to restrict or ban them, as 24 other states' constitutions do, and protect a Colorado tradition whose license sales help pay for wildlife management.
Opponents say
Hunting and fishing are already legal in Colorado. It could limit wildlife management and conservation, and terms like "traditional methods" and "preferred means" are vague.

Official text

Amendment 84 Mail Ballot Voter Identification

Needs 55% of the vote

In federal and statewide elections, requires voters to sign their mail ballot and write the last four digits of their Social Security number or their Real ID-compliant Colorado driver's license or ID number on the outside of it. A ballot with missing or wrong information wouldn't be counted until the voter fixes it, which could be done with other forms of ID.

Supporters say
It adds a second identity check to mail ballots.
Opponents say
Voter fraud is rare; the extra step is unnecessary and could keep eligible voters' ballots from being counted.

Official text

Amendment 85 Plain Language Ballot Questions

Needs 55% of the vote

Requires all state and local ballot questions to be written in plain language at no higher than an eighth-grade reading level, and bars state laws from requiring conflicting language in citizen-initiated measures.

Supporters say
Simpler language would make ballot questions easier for voters to understand.
Opponents say
Simplifying ballot language could leave out important information about a measure's costs and effects.

Official text

Amendment 86 Congressional Redistricting

Needs 55% of the vote

Re-enacts Colorado's current congressional redistricting process in the constitution and, starting with the 2028 election, bars changes to a final map unless at least three public meetings are held, the changes don't split communities of interest or purposefully favor a political party, and both the independent redistricting commission and the Colorado Supreme Court approve them.

Supporters say
It adds safeguards against partisan gerrymandering if congressional maps are redrawn mid-decade.
Opponents say
It could make it harder to redraw districts when needed and gives the commission and courts more control over the process.

Official text

Amendment 87 Graduated Income Tax

Needs a majority

Removes the constitution's flat-tax requirement and, starting in 2027, replaces Colorado's 4.4% flat income tax, for individuals and corporations, with graduated rates: 3.7% on the first $25,000 of taxable income, 4.2% up to $100,000, 4.4% up to $500,000, 7.4% up to $750,000, 7.9% up to $1 million and 8.4% above that. The state's analysis says people with less than $510,834 in Colorado taxable income would owe less and those above would owe more. The ballot question puts the increase at $2.7 billion a year, the required maximum estimate; the Blue Book expects about $2 billion in the first full year. The state could keep and spend the new money on K-12 schools, health care, and early child care and education. Income from selling a primary home would still be taxed at 4.4%. If both Amendment 87 and Proposition 136 pass, the legislature or a court would have to resolve the conflict.

Supporters say
Higher-income Coloradans should pay a larger share, and the new revenue would fund education, health care and child care.
Opponents say
Higher taxes could discourage investment, business activity and economic growth.

Official text

Proposition NN State Public K-12 Education Funding

Needs a majority

Placed on the ballot by the legislature. Lets the state keep revenue it would otherwise refund under TABOR, up to a new, higher limit based on what the state spends on K-12 schools. (In the first year the limit would be $4.6 billion higher; the state expects to actually keep about $500 million.) For 10 years, the money would go first to raising K-12 funding 2% a year, as revenue allows, for teacher pay and retention, smaller classes and career and technical courses; at least half to K-12 overall; and the rest to programs for children, prioritizing full-day preschool and child care. After that, it would go to K-12 and other purposes the legislature chooses. It doesn't raise tax rates, but it is expected to eliminate TABOR refunds for the 2026-27 and 2027-28 budget years. It requires an annual independent audit.

Supporters say
It would provide much-needed money for Colorado's schools.
Opponents say
It lets the government keep money that would otherwise be refunded to taxpayers.

Official text

Proposition 132 Penalties for Fentanyl Crimes

Needs a majority

Makes possession of any amount of fentanyl or certain synthetic opioids a felony and requires a prison sentence of 8 to 32 years for distributing any amount. People charged with possessing less than a gram would be ordered into treatment and could have the charge reduced to a misdemeanor if they complete it. It also narrows or eliminates ways to reduce penalties, including "Good Samaritan" reductions for distribution and leniency for people who didn't know a drug contained fentanyl.

Supporters say
Fentanyl is driving overdose deaths, and tougher laws would hold dealers accountable and protect communities.
Opponents say
Addiction is mainly a public health issue, and harsher penalties could mean more incarceration without reducing overdose deaths.

Official text

Proposition 133 Penalties for Human Trafficking of a Minor

Needs a majority

Requires a sentence of life in prison without parole for human trafficking of a minor for sexual servitude (now 8 to 48 years plus parole), leaving judges no discretion, and expands the crime to include knowingly trading anything of monetary value to buy or sell sexual activity with a minor.

Supporters say
Child sex trafficking does lasting harm and deserves a life sentence; a certain, severe punishment would deter traffickers and keep them from hurting more children.
Opponents say
Harsher sentences are unlikely to deter trafficking and could end up punishing victims who were pressured into helping traffickers, discourage reporting, and stop judges from weighing the facts of a case.

Official text

Proposition 134 Male and Female Participation in School Sports

Needs a majority

Requires K-12 and college teams to be designated male, female or coed, and limits athletes to teams that match their sex as defined by biological reproductive characteristics, or to coed teams. A girl could play on a boys' team when no girls' team is available.

Supporters say
It protects fairness and competitive balance in girls' sports, given physical differences that can affect athletic performance.
Opponents say
It discriminates against transgender athletes and could create legal and practical problems for schools.

Official text

Proposition 135 Prohibit Certain Surgeries on Minors

Needs a majority

Bans surgery on minors intended to change their biological sex characteristics, and bars state or federal funds, Medicaid or insurance from paying for it.

Supporters say
Minors shouldn't make irreversible medical decisions; these procedures should wait until adulthood.
Opponents say
It interferes with decisions made by families and doctors and unfairly targets transgender youth.

Official text

Proposition 136 Income Tax Rate Cap

Needs a majority

Sets the current 4.4% income tax rate as the maximum for individuals and corporations in state law, starting Jan. 1, 2027. It doesn't change today's rate. If both Proposition 136 and Amendment 87 pass, the legislature or a court would have to resolve the conflict.

Supporters say
A cap keeps taxes predictable and encourages investment.
Opponents say
It's designed to put Amendment 87 in legal jeopardy, inviting confusion and a costly court fight, and would have no lasting effect, since raising tax rates already requires voter approval.

Official text

Proposition 137 Designate Sporting Goods Sales Tax Revenue for Conservation

Needs a majority

Lets the state keep and spend part of its existing sales tax revenue from sporting goods, estimated at $175 million a year, on land, water and forest conservation, wildfire prevention and outdoor recreation, outside the TABOR limit. In years the state collects more than that limit, that means smaller TABOR refunds; in other years, less money for other budget priorities. It doesn't raise tax rates.

Supporters say
Keeping this existing revenue would pay for conservation, wildfire prevention, water and outdoor recreation.
Opponents say
It lets the government keep money that could otherwise be refunded to taxpayers.

Official text

Delta County ballot measures

Paonia Ballot Issue 2A Marijuana sales tax replaces per-sale tax

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside Paonia town limits.

Replaces Paonia's $5-per-sale occupational tax on marijuana with a 5% sales tax on retail and medical marijuana, marijuana products and accessories. The ballot calls it a tax decrease of up to $40,000 in 2027. The money could go to any lawful town purpose and would be exempt from TABOR limits.

Ballot language

SHALL THE TOWN OF PAONIA TAXES BE DECREASED UP TO $40,000.00 ANNUALLY IN 2027, THE FIRST FULL FISCAL YEAR OF COLLECTION, AND BY WHATEVER AMOUNT IS RAISED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER, BY REMOVAL OF THE OCCUPATIONAL TAX OF $5.00 PER SALES TRANSACTION, AND THROUGH THE ADOPTION OF A SALES TAX AT THE RATE OF FIVE PERCENT (5%) OF THE PRICE PAID BY THE PURCHASER ON THE SALES OF RETAIL AND MEDICAL MARIJUANA, MARIJUANA PRODUCTS, AND MARIJUANA ACCESSORIES, AS DEFINED IN THE COLORADO MARIJUANA CODE, COLORADO MARIJUANA RULES, AND APPLICABLE TOWN ORDINANCES, AND COMMENCING UPON THE ADOPTION OF LOCAL REGULATIONS BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, AS MAY BE AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, WITH THE REVENUES RECEIVED FROM SUCH TAX TO BE SPENT ON ANY LAWFUL MUNICIPAL PURPOSE? AND SHALL ALL REVENUES FROM SUCH TAX AND ANY EARNINGS THEREON BE COLLECTED, RETAINED, AND SPENT AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE WITHOUT LIMITATION OR CONDITION, AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REVENUE OR EXPENDITURE LIMITATIONS CONTAINED IN ARTICLE X SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION OR ANY OTHER LAW?

Official text

Orchard City Ballot Issue 2B New 0.75% town sales tax

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside Orchard City town limits.

Adds a 0.75% town sales tax starting Jan. 1, 2027, estimated at $210,000 a year, for the town's general fund, including town services, hiring and keeping employees, and roads. The revenue would be exempt from TABOR limits.

Ballot language

SHALL THE TOWN OF ORCHARD CITY’S TAXES BE INCREASED $210,000.00 ANNUALLY, COMMENCING ON JANUARY 1, 2027, AND BY WHATEVER ADDITIONAL AMOUNTS ARE RAISED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER, BY THE IMPOSITION OF A SALES TAX AT A RATE OF THREE-QUARTERS OF ONE PERCENT (0.75%) PER DOLLAR OF TAXABLE TRANSACTIONS, WITH REVENUES DIRECTED TO THE GENERAL FUND TO SUPPORT THE OPERATIONAL AND SERVICE COSTS OF THE TOWN, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: 1. IMPROVING AND EXPANDING TOWN SERVICES, 2. RECRUITING AND RETAINING HIGH-QUALITY EMPLOYEES, AND 3. MAINTAINING AND IMPROVING ROADS; AND SHALL SUCH TAX REVENUES BE COLLECTED, RETAINED AND SPENT AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE AND AN EXCEPTION TO THE LIMITS WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE APPLY UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION OR ANY OTHER LAW?

Official text

Cedaredge Ballot Issue 2C Additional 1% sales and use tax

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside Cedaredge town limits.

Adds a 1% town sales and use tax starting Jan. 1, 2027, estimated at $500,000 in 2027. At least 20% each would go to roads, recreation and public safety (including a school resource officer), at least 15% to economic development, and the remaining 25% to any of those purposes as the town board decides each year. None of it could go to the town-owned golf course. The revenue would be exempt from TABOR limits.

Ballot language

SHALL TOWN OF CEDAREDGE TAXES BE INCREASED $500,000 IN 2027 (THE FIRST FULL FISCAL YEAR) AND BY SUCH ADDITIONAL AMOUNTS AS ARE GENERATED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER THROUGH THE IMPOSITION OF AN ADDITIONAL 1% SALES AND USE TAX COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2027, TO BE USED BY THE TOWN SPECIFICALLY FOR THE FOLLOWING COMMUNITY PROJECTS, PROGRAMS AND SERVICES: PUBLIC ROADWAYS: NO LESS THAN 20% FOR MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENT OF ROADS AND TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDING TOWN STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND OTHER CORE FACILITIES; AND PUBLIC RECREATION: NO LESS THAN 20% FOR MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SUCH AS TRAILS, SPORT COURTS, PUBLIC PARKS; HOWEVER, NO PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAX SHALL BE ALLOCATED TO THE TOWN-OWNED GOLF COURSE; AND PUBLIC SAFETY: NO LESS THAN 20% FOR OPERATING EXPENSES FOR MUNICIPAL LAW AND CODE ENFORCEMENT, INCLUDING A SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER; AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: NO LESS THAN 15% FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SUPPORTING BUSINESSES LOCATED WITHIN THE TOWN OF CEDAREDGE INCLUDING MARKETING, PROMOTIONS, AND EVENTS; AND BALANCE: 25% TO BE ALLOCATED ANNUALLY BY RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO ANY OR ALL OF THE SERVICES LISTED ABOVE; HOWEVER, NO PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAX SHALL BE ALLOCATED TO THE TOWN-OWNED GOLF COURSE; AND SHALL THE TOWN BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT, RETAIN, AND SPEND ALL REVENUES FROM SUCH SALES AND USE TAX AS A VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE AND EXCEPTION TO ANY SPENDING OR REVENUE RESTRICTIONS OR OTHER LIMITS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION?

Official text

Hotchkiss Fire District Ballot Issue 6A Fire district 0.4% sales and use tax

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside the Hotchkiss Fire District.

Adds a 0.4% sales and use tax in the Hotchkiss Fire District starting Jan. 1, 2027, estimated at $280,000, to be used only for fire protection in the district, on top of its existing property taxes. The revenue would be exempt from TABOR limits.

Ballot language

SHALL HOTCHKISS FIRE DISTRICT TAXES BE INCREASED BY TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($280,000.00) ON JANUARY 1, 2027 AND BY SUCH AMOUNTS GENERATED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER FROM A SALES AND USE TAX OF FOUR TENTHS OF ONE PERCENT (0.4%) TO BE USED SOLEY FOR FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES WITHIN THE DISTRICT; AND SUCH TAX BE IN ADDITION TO THE CURRENT TAXES IMPOSED ON REAL PROPERTY OWNERS; AND MAY THE DISTRICT COLLECT, KEEP, AND SPEND THE REVENUES FROM SUCH TAX EVERY YEAR AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION?

Official text

Montrose County ballot measures

Montrose Ballot Question 2A Move city elections to November

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside Montrose city limits.

Amends the city charter to move Montrose's general municipal election from April of even-numbered years to November of even-numbered years.

Ballot language

Shall Article I and III of the Charter of the City of Montrose, Colorado be amended to move the general municipal election from April of even-numbered years to November of even-numbered years?

Official text

Montrose Ballot Question 2B Eight-year lifetime limit on council service

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside Montrose city limits.

Amends the city charter to limit City Council members to eight years of elected service in their lifetime, through any combination of consecutive or nonconsecutive terms, for any candidate after Nov. 3, 2026.

Ballot language

Shall Article I and III of the Charter of the City of Montrose, Colorado be amended to restrict council members to serve eight years of elected service in that person's lifetime with such eight years occurring through any combination of consecutive or nonconsecutive terms of office, and shall this requirement apply to any candidate after November 3, 2026?

Official text

Montrose Ballot Question 2C Council say over hiring and firing the police chief

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside Montrose city limits.

Amends the city charter so City Council can approve or reject the city manager's decision to appoint or fire the police chief.

Ballot language

Shall Article VIII of the Charter of the City of Montrose, Colorado be amended to allow City Council the right to approve or disapprove the City Manager's decision to appoint and discharge the Police Chief of the Montrose Police Department?

Official text

Montrose Ballot Question 2D Council say over hiring and firing the city clerk

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside Montrose city limits.

Amends the city charter so City Council can approve or reject the city manager's decision to appoint or fire the city clerk.

Ballot language

Shall Article VIII of the Charter of the City of Montrose, Colorado be amended to allow City Council the right to approve or disapprove of the City Manager's decision to appoint and discharge the City Clerk?

Official text

West End Health Service District Ballot Question 6A Create the West End Health Service District

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside the proposed district in Montrose County's West End.

Asks whether to create the West End Health Service District, a new special district. The same ballot elects its first board (listed with the Montrose County races).

Ballot language

Shall West End Health Service District be organized?

Official text

West End Health Service District Ballot Issue 6B Property tax for the new health district

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside the proposed district in Montrose County's West End.

Raises property taxes in the proposed district by $949,950 a year starting in collection year 2027, with a levy of up to 20 mills, for the district's operating and capital costs. The district's revenue would be exempt from TABOR limits.

Ballot language

SHALL WEST END HEALTH SERVICE DISTRICT TAXES BE INCREASED $949,950.00 ANNUALLY BEGINNING IN COLLECTION YEAR 2027, AND BY SUCH AMOUNTS AS MAY BE GENERATED THEREAFTER BY LEVYING AN AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAX NOT TO EXCEED 20.000 MILLS, TO PAY DISTRICT OPERATING AND CAPITAL EXPENSES, PROVIDED THAT SUCH MILL LEVY RATE MAY BE ADJUSTED TO OFFSET REVENUE LOSSES RESULTING FROM REFUNDS, ABATEMENTS AND CHANGES IN THE LAW OR THE METHOD FOR CALCULATING ASSESSED VALUATION; AND SHALL SUCH REVENUES AND ALL OTHER DISTRICT REVENUES BE COLLECTED, RETAINED AND SPENT AS A VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE, OFFSET AND EXCEPTION TO THE LIMITS WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE APPLY UNDER TABOR (ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION) OR ANY OTHER LAW?

Official text

Ouray County ballot measures

Ouray County Ballot Issue 1A Disaster recovery sales tax

Needs a majority

Who votes: All Ouray County voters, including Ouray and Ridgway.

Adds a 0.5% countywide sales tax that drops to 0.3% after Dec. 31, 2030, and has no end date, estimated at $1.05 million in 2027. The money would be split 70% to the county, 15% to the City of Ouray and 15% to Ridgway, for disaster recovery and resilience, including fire mitigation, watershed protection and emergency management. The revenue would be exempt from TABOR limits.

Ballot language

SHALL OURAY COUNTY TAXES BE INCREASED $1,050,000 ANNUALLY (FIRST FULL FISCAL YEAR DOLLAR INCREASE IN 2027) BY IMPOSING AN ADDITIONAL 0.5% COUNTY-WIDE SALES TAX, DECLINING TO 0.3% AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2030 WITH REVENUES TO BE DIVIDED (70% TO OURAY COUNTY, 15% TO THE CITY OF OURAY AND 15% TO THE TOWN OF RIDGWAY), FOR THE PURPOSE OF FUNDING DISASTER RECOVERY AND RESILIENCE IN OURAY COUNTY, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING: PROTECTING CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE, FIRE MITIGATION, LANDSCAPE STABILIZATION, WATERSHED PROTECTION, SUPPORTING ECONOMIC RECOVERY, AND FUNDING THE COUNTY, CITY, AND TOWN, PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS, FOR DECLARED DISASTERS AND EMERGENCIES; ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' RESOLUTION NO. 2026-019 AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET LAWS, AND SHALL THE FIRST YEAR REVENUES, AND WHATEVER ADDITIONAL AMOUNTS ARE RAISED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER, BE COLLECTED AND SPENT AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE NOTWITHSTANDING ANY LIMITATION OR CONDITION UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION, C.R.S. 29-2-301 ET SEQ., AS AMENDED, OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW?

Official text

San Miguel County ballot measures

Telluride R-1 Ballot Issue 5A School property tax increase (mill levy override)

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters who live in Telluride School District R-1.

Raises Telluride R-1 school property taxes by $2,674,059 for collection year 2027, and after that by whatever amount brings the district's voter-approved local funding to 50% of its state "total program" funding, to keep teachers and staff, sustain programs and support college and career readiness.

Ballot language

SHALL TELLURIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT R-1'S TAXES BE INCREASED BY $2,674,059 FOR COLLECTION YEAR 2027, AND ANNUALLY THEREAFTER BY AN AMOUNT THAT, WHEN COMBINED WITH TAXES PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY DISTRICT VOTERS, EQUALS FIFTY PERCENT OF THE DISTRICT’S TOTAL PROGRAM AS PERMITTED BY STATE LAW FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL REVENUES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF: • RETAINING HIGH-QUALITY TEACHERS AND STAFF; • SUSTAINING HIGH-QUALITY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS; AND • SUPPORTING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT LEADING TO COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS, THROUGH THE LEVY OF PROPERTY TAXES AS A MILL LEVY OVERRIDE FOR THE DISTRICT’S GENERAL FUND AT A RATE THAT WILL PRODUCE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO FIFTY PERCENT OF THE DISTRICT’S TOTAL PROGRAM (AS SUCH TERM IS DEFINED IN STATE LAW OR ANY SIMILAR TERM IN A SUCCESSOR PROVISION)?

Official text

Hinsdale County ballot measures

Lake City Ballot Question 2A Move town elections to November

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside Lake City town limits.

Moves Lake City's regular town election from April to November of even-numbered years, when statewide general elections are held, so the town can take part in elections run by Hinsdale County.

Ballot language

Shall the Town of Lake City's regular Municipal Election be moved from the first Tuesday in April of even-numbered years to the first Tuesday in November of even-numbered years when General Statewide Elections are held to promote increased voter participation, reduce Town election expenses, and allow the Town to participate in elections coordinated by Hinsdale County?

Official text

Lake City Ballot Question 2B Cut the town board from six trustees to four

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside Lake City town limits.

Reduces the number of trustees on the Lake City Board of Trustees from six to four, starting with the town's 2028 election.

Ballot language

Shall the number of Trustees on the Town of Lake City Board of Trustees be reduced from six to four, to take effect beginning with the Town's 2028 Municipal Election, in order to promote more efficient Town governance and reduce the difficulty of filling elected positions?

Official text

Archuleta School District 50JT Ballot Issue 5A School bond, only with a state BEST grant

Needs a majority

Who votes: Hinsdale County voters who live in Archuleta County School District 50JT, in the southern part of the county.

Lets Archuleta County School District 50JT borrow up to $79.9 million, with a repayment cost of up to $156.5 million, only if it wins a state BEST grant. The money would build a new PK-8 school and update Pagosa Peak Open School facilities, repaid by a property tax increase of up to $6.7 million a year.

Ballot language

SHALL ARCHULETA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 50JT DEBT BE INCREASED BY UP TO $79,900,000, WITH A REPAYMENT COST OF UP TO $156,500,000, WITH THE INCREASE TO OCCUR ONLY IF THE DISTRICT RECEIVES A "BEST" GRANT AWARD FROM THE STATE OF COLORADO THAT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE REPAID, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A HIGH-QUALITY LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: CONSTRUCTING AND EQUIPPING A NEW PK-8 SCHOOL THAT WILL IMPROVE SAFETY AND SECURITY WHILE MEETING THE EDUCATIONAL NEEDS OF OUR STUDENTS; PROVIDING FUNDING TO PAGOSA PEAK OPEN SCHOOL TO UPDATE AND EQUIP EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES FOR STUDENTS; WITH FUNDING SUBJECT TO AN ANNUAL AUDIT BY AN INDEPENDENT THIRD-PARTY EXPERT AND WITH THE SPENDING OF ALL FUNDS DETAILED ON THE DISTRICT'S WEBSITE; AND SHALL DISTRICT TAXES BE INCREASED BY UP TO $6,700,000 ANNUALLY TO REPAY THIS DEBT; AND SHALL THE MILL LEVY BE IMPOSED IN ANY YEAR IN AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF, PREMIUM, IF ANY, AND INTEREST ON SUCH DEBT OR ANY REFUNDING DEBT (OR TO CREATE A RESERVE FOR SUCH PAYMENT) REGARDLESS OF RATE; WHICH DEBT SHALL CONSIST OF ONE OR MORE SERIES OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TO BEAR INTEREST, MATURE, BE SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION, WITH NO MORE THAN A 3% PREMIUM, AND BE ISSUED AT SUCH TIME, AT SUCH PRICE (AT, ABOVE, OR BELOW PAR) AND IN SUCH MANNER AND CONTAINING SUCH TERMS CONSISTENT WITH THIS BALLOT ISSUE AS THE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY DETERMINE AND ALLOWING THE DISTRICT TO COLLECT, RETAIN AND SPEND ALL PROCEEDS OF THE NEW TAX REVENUE AS A VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION OR ANY OTHER LAW?

Official text

Upper San Juan Health Service District Ballot Issue 7B Health district keeps all its revenue

Needs a majority

Who votes: Hinsdale County voters in the Upper San Juan Health Service District, in the southern part of the county.

Without raising taxes, lets the Upper San Juan Health Service District, which runs Pagosa Springs Medical Center and ambulance service, continue to keep and spend all its revenue each year regardless of TABOR and state revenue limits.

Ballot language

WITHOUT RAISING TAXES, SHALL THE UPPER SAN JUAN HEALTH SERVICE DISTRICT (WHICH OPERATES PAGOSA SPRINGS MEDICAL CENTER AND PROVIDES EMS/AMBULANCE SERVICES, HOSPITAL AND OUTPATIENT MEDICAL CARE TO THE COMMUNITY) BE AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE TO COLLECT, RETAIN, AND SPEND ALL REVENUES OF THE DISTRICT IN EACH FISCAL YEAR HEREAFTER WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY REVENUE OR SPENDING LIMITATION CONTAINED IN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION OR SECTION 29-1-301, C.R.S.?

Official text

Mesa County ballot measures

Grand Junction Referred Measure 2B Orchard Mesa pool sales tax and debt

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside Grand Junction city limits.

Raises Grand Junction's sales and use tax from 3.39% to 3.46% starting Jan. 1, 2027 ($1.9 million in 2027) and lets the city borrow $12 million, with a repayment cost of $19 million, to repair, renovate and equip the Orchard Mesa Swimming Pool without expanding it. Most of the increase (0.04%) ends once the debt is paid, by Dec. 31, 2047, at the latest; the other 0.03% continues for the pool's operation and maintenance. The revenue would be exempt from TABOR limits.

Ballot language

SHALL CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION TAXES BE INCREASED $1,900,000 IN 2027 (THE FIRST FULL FISCAL YEAR), AND BY WHATEVER AMOUNTS AS ARE GENERATED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER BY INCREASING THE CITY'S SALES AND USE TAX RATE FROM 3.39% TO 3.46% BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2027, FOR THE PURPOSE OF GENERATING REVENUE TO FINANCE THE COSTS OF REPAIRING, RENOVATING, AND EQUIPPING THE ORCHARD MESA SWIMMING POOL, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF THE SWIMMING POOL SYSTEMS INCLUDING MECHANICAL, HEATING/VENTILATION/AIR-CONDITIONING (HVAC), ELECTRICAL AND FILTRATION AND OTHER HARDWARE NECESSARY FOR OPERATION OF THE SWIMMING POOL FACILITY BUT SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY EXPANSION BEYOND THE EXISTING 6 LANE, 25 YARD BY 25 METER, POOL CONFIGURATION, AND SHALL INCLUDE THE PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL, PREMIUM, IF ANY, AND INTEREST ON THE DEBT AUTHORIZED BY THIS QUESTION OR TO CREATE A RESERVE FOR SAME; AND SUCH RATE SHALL BE REDUCED BY 0.04% ON JANUARY 1ST FOLLOWING THE DATE ON WHICH THE DEBT APPROVED HEREBY IS PAID IN FULL (BUT IN NO EVENT SHALL SUCH REDUCTION OCCUR LATER THAN DECEMBER 31, 2047), WITH THE REMAINING INCREASE AUTHORIZED BY THIS QUESTION (.03%) TO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE ORCHARD MESA SWIMMING POOL, AND SHALL CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION DEBT BE INCREASED $12,000,000 WITH A REPAYMENT COST OF $19,000,000 TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR THE COSTS OF REPAIRING, RENOVATING, AND EQUIPPING THE ORCHARD MESA SWIMMING POOL WITH THE DEBT BEING PAYABLE FROM THIS TAX INCREASE OR ANY OTHER GENERAL REVENUE OF THE CITY, PROVIDED THAT THE SPECIFIC TERMS OF THE DEBT, INCLUDING A PROVISION FOR EARLY REPAYMENT WITH OR WITHOUT A PREMIUM, AND THE PRICE AT WHICH IT WILL BE SOLD BEING DETERMINED BY THE CITY AS NECESSARY AND PRUDENT, WITH THE CITY BEING AUTHORIZED TO IMPOSE, COLLECT, RETAIN AND SPEND SUCH REVENUES AND ANY INVESTMENT EARNINGS AND INTEREST THEREON, AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE UNDER ARTICLE X SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION AND ANY OTHER LAW?

Official text

Palisade Ballot Issue 2A Town sales tax from 2% to 3%

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside Palisade town limits.

Raises Palisade's town sales tax from 2% to 3% through Dec. 31, 2034, an estimated $600,000 in the first full year. Three-quarters of the increase (0.75%) would go to repairs on 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th streets and improvements at Peach Bowl Park, the swimming pool and Riverbend Park; the other quarter (0.25%) would go to emergency services. The revenue would be exempt from TABOR limits.

Ballot language

SHALL TOWN OF PALISADE TAXES BE INCREASED BY AN ESTIMATED $600,000 ANNUALLY FOR THE FIRST FULL FISCAL YEAR (FIRST FULL FISCAL YEAR INCREASE) AND BY WHATEVER ADDITIONAL AMOUNTS ARE RAISED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER, THROUGH AN INCREASE IN THE TOWN'S SALES TAX RATE FROM 2.0% TO 3.0%, WHICH INCREASE WILL TERMINATE ON DECEMBER 31, 2034, SUCH REVENUES TO BE COLLECTED, RETAINED AND SPENT BY THE TOWN AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REVENUE OR EXPENDITURE LIMIT SET FORTH IN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION OR ANY OTHER LAW; AND SHALL ALL REVENUES DERIVED FROM SUCH INCREASED 1.0% SALES TAX BE COLLECTED AND 0.75% OF SAID INCREASE SPENT TO FUND: STREET REPAIRS FOR 4TH, 5TH, 6TH AND 7TH STREETS, IMPROVEMENTS TO PEACH BOWL PARK, SWIMMING POOL IMPROVEMENTS, IMPROVEMENTS TO RIVERBEND PARK, AND 0.25% OF SAID INCREASE SPENT TO FUND EMERGENCY SERVICES, AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE, AND IN CONNECTION THEREWITH SHALL THE TOWN BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT AND RETAIN OR EXPEND THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAX AND INVESTMENT EARNINGS THEREON FOR SUCH PURPOSES, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY APPLICABLE LIMITATION ON REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES, INCLUDING THE LIMITATIONS SET FORTH IN ARTICLE X SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION?

Official text

De Beque Ballot Issue 2C Medical marijuana occupational tax

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside De Beque town limits.

Creates an occupational tax of up to $5 per pound of medical marijuana or marijuana products sold or transferred by medical marijuana centers, cultivation operations and infused-product makers in De Beque, starting Jan. 1, 2027, estimated at $40,000 in the first full year. The revenue would be exempt from TABOR limits.

Ballot language

SHALL THE TOWN OF DE BEQUE TAXES BE INCREASED BY $40,000.00 ANNUALLY (FIRST FULL FISCAL YEAR INCREASE) AND BY WHATEVER AMOUNTS ARE RAISED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER THROUGH THE LEVY OF AN OCCUPATIONAL TAX IN THE AMOUNT OF UP TO $5 FOR EACH POUND OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA OR MARIJUANA PRODUCTS SOLD OR TRANSFERRED BY ANY MEDICAL MARIJUANA CENTER, ALSO KNOWN AS A MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY, ANY MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION OPERATION, AND ANY MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCTS MANUFACTURER WITHIN THE TOWN OF DE BEQUE, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2027; AND SHALL ALL REVENUE DERIVED FROM SUCH OCCUPATION TAX BE COLLECTED AND SPENT, AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REVENUE OR EXPENDITURE LIMITATIONS CONTAINED IN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20, OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 1 OF TITLE 29, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES OR ANY OTHER LAW?

Official text

District 51 Ballot Issue 4A School property tax increase (mill levy override)

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters who live in Mesa County Valley School District 51.

Raises District 51 property taxes by up to $23.2 million (levied in 2026, collected in 2027) through a mill levy override of up to 7.850 mills that can rise with Denver-Boulder inflation. The ballot estimates the cost at $18.09 a month on an average $400,000 home. The money would go to school safety and security officers, career, technical and STEM programs, and teacher and staff pay, with an annual independent audit.

Ballot language

SHALL MESA COUNTY VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 51 TAXES BE INCREASED UP TO $23.2 MILLION IN 2026 FOR COLLECTION IN 2027 AND BY WHATEVER AMOUNTS ARE RAISED ANNUALLY THEREAFTER FROM AN OVERRIDE MILL LEVY IMPOSED AT A RATE NOT TO EXCEED 7.850 MILLS, WHICH MILL LEVY MAY BE INCREASED IN ANY YEAR FOR INFLATION BASED ON THE ANNUAL CHANGES IN THE DENVER-BOULDER CONSUMER PRICE INDEX, AND WHICH WOULD COST A HOMEOWNER AN ESTIMATED $18.09 PER MONTH ON AN AVERAGE HOME VALUED AT $400,000 BASED ON THE ASSESSED VALUE AND ASSESSMENT RATES AS OF DECEMBER 2025 AND DOES NOT REFLECT FUTURE CHANGES IN ASSESSED VALUE, ASSESSMENT RATE, OR LAW, FOR GENERAL FUND PURPOSES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: MAINTAIN AND EXPAND EFFORTS TO ENSURE A SAFE AND SECURE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF, SUCH AS ADDING ADDITIONAL SAFETY AND SECURITY OFFICERS AND SUPPORT FOR SCHOOLS; MAINTAIN AND EXPAND WORKFORCE READINESS OPPORTUNITIES, SUCH AS CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND STEM PROGRAMMING (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATH), BY PROVIDING REAL-WORLD, HANDS-ON LEARNING EXPERIENCES FOR STUDENTS AT EVERY LEVEL; KEEP AND ATTRACT HIGH-QUALITY TEACHERS BY BRINGING SALARIES AND BENEFITS CLOSER TO THE MARKET AVERAGE COMPARED TO PEER SCHOOL DISTRICTS, AND PROVIDE FUNDING FOR ANNUAL SALARY AND BENEFIT INCREASES FOR TEACHERS AND STAFF FOR CONTINUED SERVICE; AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE SUBJECT TO AN ANNUAL INDEPENDENT AUDIT PUBLISHED ON THE DISTRICT’S WEBSITE; AND SHALL SUCH TAX INCREASE BE AN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX MILL LEVY IN EXCESS OF THE LEVY AUTHORIZED FOR THE DISTRICT'S GENERAL FUND, PURSUANT TO AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22-54-108, C.R.S.; AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT THE FULL AMOUNT OF REVENUE AUTHORIZED BY THIS QUESTION AND PRIOR MILL LEVY OVERRIDE QUESTIONS SUBJECT TO THE LIMIT ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 22-54-108(3)(B)(VI), C.R.S.; AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT, RETAIN, AND SPEND ALL REVENUES FROM SUCH TAXES AND THE EARNINGS FROM THE INVESTMENT OF SUCH REVENUES AS A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION?

Official text

Palisade Rural Fire Protection District Ballot Issue 6A Fire district property tax increase

Needs a majority

Who votes: Voters inside the Palisade Rural Fire Protection District.

Raises the district's operating property tax from 5.242 to 11.5 mills (12.5 mills in all, with 0.5 mills each for capital and pensions), a $185,000-a-year increase starting Jan. 1, 2027. The ballot estimates $42.55 more a year for each $100,000 of residential value. The money would go to fire and emergency services, buildings and equipment, and all district revenue would be permanently exempt from TABOR and other revenue limits.

Ballot language

SHALL PALISADE RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT TAXES BE INCREASED $185,000 ANNUALLY BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2027 OR BY SUCH AMOUNTS AS ARE RAISED BY INCREASING THE DISTRICT'S MILL LEVY FOR GENERAL OPERATING PURPOSES FROM 5.242 MILLS TO 11.5 MILLS, FOR A TOTAL PROPERTY TAX RATE OF 12.5 MILLS (11.5 MILLS FOR GENERAL OPERATING PURPOSES PLUS 0.5 MILLS FOR CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AND 0.5 MILLS FOR PENSION FUND PAYMENTS) RESULTING IN AN EXPECTED 2027 ANNUAL TAX INCREASE OF $42.55 FOR EACH $100,000 OF RESIDENTIAL VALUE FOR THE PURPOSES OF PROVIDING EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES INCLUDING FIRE RESPONSE, FIRE PREVENTION, SAFETY INSPECTIONS, EMERGENCY AND MEDICAL RESPONSE, THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF FIRE AND EMERGENCY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, AND THE ACQUISITION BY PURCHASE, LEASE OR OTHERWISE, OF SUCH EQUIPMENT OR PROPERTIES AS REQUIRED IN PROVIDING EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES TO THE RESIDENTS, PROPERTY OWNERS AND BUSINESSES SERVED BY THE DISTRICT AND SHALL ALL DISTRICT REVENUE GENERATED FROM THE 12.5 MILL LEVY AND ANY OTHER SOURCE BE COLLECTED, RETAINED AND SPENT AS A PERMANENT VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE AND AS AN EXEMPTION TO THE PROVISIONS AND RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH IN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION ("TABOR") AND SECTIONS 29-1-301 AND 29-1-1702, C.R.S. AND ANY OTHER LAW THAT LIMITS THE DISTRICT'S REVENUES OR EXPENDITURES AS IT CURRENTLY EXISTS OR AS IT MAY BE AMENDED IN THE FUTURE, ALL WITHOUT LIMITING IN ANY YEAR THE AMOUNT OF OTHER REVENUES THAT MAY BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE DISTRICT?

Official text

More voter guides

Tools from other organizations

These interactive tools are made by other organizations, not by KVNF. We offer them as a convenience; KVNF doesn't control what they show. Each tool's own privacy policy covers what it does with information you enter.

Build Your Ballot

A tool from Branch Politics

Enter your address and email, and it looks up your districts and what will be on your ballot. Branch shares the email addresses entered here with KVNF; entering yours means you agree to receive email from KVNF.

Or open it in a new tab

Balance the Colorado Budget

A tool from Weigh In, with the University of Colorado Denver School of Public Affairs and COLab

Decide three ballot measures that affect how much money the state has, then make nine spending choices to balance the budget.

Or open it in a new tab